Is there a non zero probability that pajeets will have a decent imageboards where they can shitpost freely such that high IQ posts also come around?

>>351 The problem in your argument is the assumption that the problem is with the imageboard and not the unwanted 76 mentally ill incels.

>>353 I have proven 142 IQ and gayush deletes my posts and threads from both bhach and inch /ThatLineOfDiscussion

>>353 This. Most jeets don't even want to behave, just want to post pajeeta pics or spam with literal tatti pic.

One more thread of mine get nuked btw I think the anons at 4chan are correct tbh when they say >fecaloids will never be human

>>357 No sense of humour or irony or sarcasm or anything at all, just trigger happy at the delete button fuck this shit, this is not worth my time

One day dayush will realize what "/b/ - Random" is suppose to be.

>>355 >>358 Are you chamrathi anon?

Have fun faggots (you can't btw) I won't be engaging on either bhach or inch from now on, but other anons will discover by themselves that these places are run by fecaloids and they'll also shit up the place instead of participating like good anons

>>358 >saaaar let me post the current prime minister fake videos >saaaaar let me call my own country men the slurssss >saaaar why are you deleting it saaaaaar >saaaar its my birthright saaaaaar >saaaaar i wont leave saaaaaaaar

>>359 no, there's no way that that will happen, if you haven't realised it yet >>360 no, I never name fagged in the last 20 years, other than a few times when I wanted to troll some tard

>>364 >I never name fagged in the last 20 years >20 years 😲😲😲